Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| effectcaps [2014/05/26 13:20] – ifiguero | effectcaps [2015/03/13 16:31] (current) – ifiguero | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Effect Capabilities in Haskell ====== | ====== Effect Capabilities in Haskell ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Submitted to Special Issue of Science of Computer Programming ===== | ||
| ==== Abstract ==== | ==== Abstract ==== | ||
| Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
| to establish a way to statically share capabilities between modules, | to establish a way to statically share capabilities between modules, | ||
| as well as to check proper access permissions to effects at compile | as well as to check proper access permissions to effects at compile | ||
| - | time. We exemplify how to tame effect interferences using effect | + | time. We first exemplify how to tame effect interferences using |
| - | capabilities, by treating state and exceptions. | + | effect capabilities by treating state and exceptions. |
| - | + | on taming I/O by proposing a fine-grained lattice of I/O permissions | |
| - | ====== Implementation and Examples | + | based on the current classification of its operations. Finally, we |
| - | The Haskell implementation of Effect Capabilities | + | show that integrating effect capabilities with modern tag-based |
| - | The code was tested in the [[http:// | + | monadic mechanisms provides a practical, modular and safe mechanism |
| + | for monadic programming in Haskell. | ||
| + | | ||
| + | ==== Implementation and Examples ==== | ||
| + | The Haskell implementation of Effect Capabilities | ||
| ====== Authors ====== | ====== Authors ====== | ||