Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- events:workshops:esecfse2012 [2013/03/26 10:07] – abergel
+++ events:workshops:esecfse2012 [2013/04/09 14:23] (current) – [Guidelines for Packaging AEC Submissions] abergel
@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 Artifacts that are positively evaluated, will be formally recognized in the proceedings and at the conference.
-====== Important Dates ======
+====== Submission Summary ======
+  * Due on: Tuesday June 4, 2013 (following week after the paper notification)
+  * Notification from the AEC: Tuesday June 25, 2013 (one week before the camera ready version)
+  * Format: TODO
+  * Contact: [[mailto:abergel@dcc.uchile.cl|Alexandre Bergel]] and [[mailto:bettini@dsi.unifi.it|Lorenzo Bettini]]
 ====== Process ======
 Artifacts will be evaluated in a similar fashion than papers are. They will be reviewed by a committee (the Artifact Evaluation Committee, AEC) and graded according to what your accepted paper describes.
@@ Line 17: / Line 18: @@
 Software artifacts who successfully passed our evaluation will be officially recognized (in the proceedings, during the conference, during the social event presentation). Fireworks will be for the distinguished software artifacts.
-====== Guidelines for Packaging AEC Submissions ======
@@ Line 44: / Line 43: @@
   * [[http://ecoop13-aec.cs.brown.edu|ECOOP'13]]
   * [[http://splashcon.org/2013/cfp/due-june-01-2013/665-oopsla-artifacts|OOPSLA'13]]
+  * [[http://cs.brown.edu/~sk/Memos/Conference-Artifact-Evaluation/|ESEC/FSE'11]]