Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
events:workshops:esecfse2013 [2013/03/30 10:00] abergel [Artifact Evaluation at ESEC/FSE 2013] |
events:workshops:esecfse2013 [2013/08/26 18:14] (current) abergel |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| Artifacts that are positively evaluated, will be formally recognized in the proceedings and at the conference. | Artifacts that are positively evaluated, will be formally recognized in the proceedings and at the conference. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Distinguished Artifacts ====== | ||
| + | There are 2 artifacts that deserved to be distinguished: | ||
| + | * Paul Marinescu and Cristian Cadar. KATCH: High-Coverage Testing of Software Patches | ||
| + | * Aravind Machiry, Rohan Tahiliani and Mayur Naik. Dynodroid: An Input Generation System for Android Apps | ||
| + | |||
| ====== Submission Summary ====== | ====== Submission Summary ====== | ||
| - | * Due on: Monday July 1st, 2013 (beginning of the following week after the paper notification) | + | * Due on: Sunday June 2nd 2013 (end of the week of the paper notification) **-- CLOSED** |
| - | * Notification from the AEC: Friday June 26, 2013 (one week before the camera ready version) | + | * Notification from the AEC: Monday June 24, 2013 (one week before the camera ready version) **-- PASSED** |
| * Format: [[events/workshops/esecfse2013/guidelines|Guidelines for Packaging AEC Submissions]] | * Format: [[events/workshops/esecfse2013/guidelines|Guidelines for Packaging AEC Submissions]] | ||
| - | * Contact: [[mailto:abergel@dcc.uchile.cl|Alexandre Bergel]] and [[mailto:bettini@dsi.unifi.it|Lorenzo Bettini]] | + | * Contact: [[mailto:abergel@dcc.uchile.cl|Alexandre Bergel]] and [[mailto:bettini@di.unito.it|Lorenzo Bettini]] |
| ====== Process ====== | ====== Process ====== | ||
| Artifacts will be evaluated in a similar fashion than papers are. They will be reviewed by a committee (the Artifact Evaluation Committee, AEC) and graded according to what your accepted paper describes. | Artifacts will be evaluated in a similar fashion than papers are. They will be reviewed by a committee (the Artifact Evaluation Committee, AEC) and graded according to what your accepted paper describes. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 24: | ||
| Software artifacts who successfully passed our evaluation will be officially recognized (in the proceedings, during the conference, during the social event presentation). Fireworks will be for the distinguished software artifacts. | Software artifacts who successfully passed our evaluation will be officially recognized (in the proceedings, during the conference, during the social event presentation). Fireworks will be for the distinguished software artifacts. | ||
| + | ====== Artifacts Meeting Expectation ====== | ||
| + | In total we have received 22 artifacts. 12 have been assessed as "met expectation" or "Exceeded expectations". Below is the list of artifacts that have been positively evaluated. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Out of the 12 positively evaluated artifacts, 8 will be presented on Friday 23 August 2013, during a dedicated slot 17:00 - 17:40. | ||
| + | Each presentation will have 5 minutes: | ||
| + | * Paul Marinescu and Cristian Cadar -- //KATCH: High-Coverage Testing of Software Patches// | ||
| + | * Dirk Beyer, Stefan Löwe, Evgeny Novikov, Andreas Stahlbauer and Philipp Wendler -- //Linux Driver Revisions for Regression Verification - [[http://www.sosy-lab.org/~dbeyer/cpa-reuse/regression-benchmarks/|online]]// | ||
| + | * Shahar Maoz, Jan Oliver Ringert and Bernhard Rumpe -- //Synthesis of Component and Connector Models from Crosscutting Structural Views// | ||
| + | * Marin Silic, Goran Delac and Sinisa Srbljic -- //Prediction of Atomic Web Services Reliability Based on K-means Clustering [[http://ccl.fer.hr/wordpress/people/research-assistants/marin-silic/clus-evaluation-dataset/|online]]// | ||
| + | * Nishant Sinha and Rezwana Karim -- //Compiling Mockups to Flexible UIs// [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoPdw0kWRcA|online video]] | ||
| + | * Alex Gyori, Danny Dig, Lyle Franklin and Jan Lahoda -- //Crossing the gap from imperative to functional programming through refactoring [[http://refactoring.info/tools/LambdaFicator/|online]]// | ||
| + | * Peng Liu -- //Finding Incorrect Compositions of Atomicity// | ||
| + | * Yunhui Zheng, Xiangyu Zhang and Vijay Ganesh -- //Z3-str: A String Theory Plugin on Z3 for Web Application Analysis// | ||
| - | ====== Guidelines for Packaging AEC Submissions ====== | + | The remaining 4 artifacts will be presented during their paper presentation slot: |
| + | * Meiyappan Nagappan, Thomas Zimmermann and Christian Bird -- //Diversity in Software Engineering Research -- [[http://sailhome.cs.queensu.ca/replication/representativeness/|online]]// | ||
| + | * Chengnian Sun and Siau-Cheng Khoo -- //Mining Succinct Predicated Bug Signatures// | ||
| + | * Aravind Machiry, Rohan Tahiliani and Mayur Naik -- //Dynodroid: An Input Generation System for Android Apps [[http://pag-www.gtisc.gatech.edu/dynodroid/data/|online]]// | ||
| + | * Pietro Braione, Giovanni Denaro and Mauro Pezze' -- //Enhancing Symbolic Execution with Built-in Term Rewriting and Constrained Lazy Initialization// | ||
| - | TODO | ||
| ====== Artifact Evaluation Committee ====== | ====== Artifact Evaluation Committee ====== | ||
| The committee has been carefully selected by the chairs to reflect the relevant topics of ESEC/FSE. | The committee has been carefully selected by the chairs to reflect the relevant topics of ESEC/FSE. | ||